CO129-140 - Public Offices - 1869 — Page 215

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

that despatch and he was to call our attention to the paragraphs 1 to 21 inclusive of that report.

2. That Sir J. Rogers was also pleased to enclose a copy of the Local Ordinance referred to by the Attorney General and was to request that we would favor your Lordship with our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Attorney General was public prosecutor in the sense of an Officer in whom was vested the prerogative of conducting all Criminal trials to the exclusion of private prosecutions.

In obedience to your Lordship's commands we have the honor to Report That it does not appear to us that the 11th section of the Ordinance of Hong Kong 3 of 1865 imposed upon the Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutor in the sense of conducting criminal cases in the Supreme

I made the following corrections: 1. Corrected "to to" to "1 to" for proper enumeration. 2. Changed "Allowey General" to "Attorney General" as it seems to be the correct title. 3. Corrected "request" from "was to request" to simply "request" but kept "was to" in the sentence as it seems to be part of the original phrasing. 4. Changed "our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Morney General was public prosecutor" to "our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Attorney General was public prosecutor" for clarity and correctness. 5. "Sente" was corrected to "sense". 6. "fo" was corrected to "of". 7. "fan" was corrected to "an". 8. "Rong" was corrected to "the". 9. "Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutar the sense" was corrected to "Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutor in the sense" for proper spelling and grammar. The output is formatted in HTML as requested, using `

` for paragraphs.

Edit History

2026-05-20 08:49:39 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

that despatch and he was to call our attention to the paragraphs 1 to 21 inclusive of that report. 2. That Sir J. Rogers was also pleased to enclose a copy of the Local Ordinance referred to by the Attorney General and was to request that we would favor your Lordship with our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Attorney General was public prosecutor in the sense of an Officer in whom was vested the prerogative of conducting all Criminal trials to the exclusion of private prosecutions. In obedience to your Lordship's commands we have the honor to Report That it does not appear to us that the 11th section of the Ordinance of Hong Kong 3 of 1865 imposed upon the Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutor in the sense of conducting criminal cases in the Supreme I made the following corrections: 1. Corrected "to to" to "1 to" for proper enumeration. 2. Changed "Allowey General" to "Attorney General" as it seems to be the correct title. 3. Corrected "request" from "was to request" to simply "request" but kept "was to" in the sentence as it seems to be part of the original phrasing. 4. Changed "our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Morney General was public prosecutor" to "our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Attorney General was public prosecutor" for clarity and correctness. 5. "Sente" was corrected to "sense". 6. "fo" was corrected to "of". 7. "fan" was corrected to "an". 8. "Rong" was corrected to "the". 9. "Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutar the sense" was corrected to "Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutor in the sense" for proper spelling and grammar. The output is formatted in HTML as requested, using `` for paragraphs.

Baseline (Original)

that despatch and he was to call our attention to the paragraphs to to 21 inclusive of that report. 2. That Sir J. Rogers was a also pleased to enclose a copy of the Local Ordinance referred to by the Allowey General and was to request that we would favor your Lordship with our opinion whether the right to institute and conduct a private prosecution existed or whether the Morney General was public prosecutor in the a Sente 20 3 of 1865 fo Sense 213 fan of an Officer in whom was rested the prerogative of conducting all Criminal trials to the exclusion of private prosecutions. In obedience to your Lordship's commands we have the honor to Report That it does not appear to us that the 11th section of Rong the Ordinance of Hong 3. 1865 imposed upon the Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutar the sense of conducting in criminal cases in the Supreme

2026-05-20 08:49:39 · Baseline

View content

that despatch and he was to

call our attention to the paragraphs to to 21 inclusive of that report.

2. That Sir J. Rogers was

also pleased to enclose a copy of the Local Ordinance referred to by the Allowey General and was to

request

that we would favor your Lordship with

our

opinion

whether the right to

institute and conduct a

private prosecution existed or whether

the Morney General was public prosecutor in the

Sente

20 3 of 1865

Sense

213

fan of an Officer in whom

was rested the prerogative

of conducting all Criminal trials to the exclusion of

private prosecutions.

In obedience to

your

Lordship's commands we have the honor to Report That it does not appear

to us that the 11th section

Rong

the Ordinance of Hong 3. 1865 imposed upon the Attorney General of that Colony the duty of acting as public prosecutar the sense of conducting

CO129-140 - Public Offices - 1869 — Page 215

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note